THM \(dim(V) = dim(Kerf) + dim(Imf)\)
DEF Quotient Vector Spaces \(V/W\) is a vector space
- let \(dim(V)=n\)
- let \(w_1 ... w_m\) be the basis of \(W\)
- since the basis of \(W\) is also LI we can extend it to n elements \(w_1 ... w_m, b_{m+1}, ..., b_n\)
- now we will show that \(b_{m+1}, ..., b_n\) is the basis of \(V/W\)
- first \(b_{m+1}, ..., b_n\) is LI in \(V/W\) because it is LI with the basis of W
- Proof:
- suppose for contradiction that LD, then \(k_1*b_{m+1}+ ...+ k_n*b_n \in W\) where some \(k_i\) nonzero
- \(b_{m+1}, ..., b_n\) LI so \(k_1*b_{m+1}+ ...+ k_n*b_n != 0\)
- since the basis of W generates \(k_1*b_{m+1}+ ...+ k_n*b_n = c_1*w_1+...+c_m*w_m\) where some \(c_i\) nonzero
- then we have the linear dependence of the terms \(k_1*b_{m+1}+ ...+ k_n*b_n + c_1*w_1+...+c_m*w_m = 0\) which is contradiction
- this means the basis of \(V/W\) must be greater or equal to \(b_{m+1}, ..., b_n\)
- second suppose for contradiction that basis it is greater than \(b_{m+1}, ..., b_n\), then we extend our original basis by 1 \(b_{m+1}, ..., b_n, x\)
- Proof:
- \(b_{m+1}, ..., b_n, x\) is LI in \(V/W\)
- \(w_1,...w_m, b_{m+1}, ..., b_n, x\) is LD in \(V\)
- \(c_1*w_1 +... + c_m*w_m + k_1*b_{m+1} + ... + k_n*b_n + k*x = 0\) where some coefficients are nonzero
- k cannot be zero ( otherwise LD of remaining terms)
- some \(k_i\) must be nonzero (otherwise if only \(c_i\) nonzero then \(x\) can be written in terms of \(w_1\). This would implie x is in W and \(b_{m+1}, ..., b_n, x\) is not LI in \(V/W\))
- if some \(k_i\) nonzero then we have contradiction since \(k_i*b_{m+i} + k*x\) is in W, which means \(b_{m+i}, x\) are LD in \(V/W\)
- so this cannot be
- This means length of basis for \(V/W\) must be equal to \(b_{m+1}, ..., b_n\), giving us \(dim(V) = dim(V/W) + dim(W)\)
- Key ideas from above: Basis of subspace is LI in superspace
- Extension of existing LI elements to new basis allows us to draw powerful conclusions because we can infer additional properties
- ??? Is there some general way to capture the relationship between, LI, LD elements instead of doing this case-by-case check?
- Interesting way to prove by contradiction of \(|G| < dim(V)\)
- \(G={g_1}\) with \(V={v_1, v_2}\)
- \(v1=a_1*g1\)
- \(v2=a_2*g1\)
- then \(k*v1+k*v2=0\)
- \(G={g_1, g_2}\) with \(V={v_1, v_2, v_3}\)
- \(v_1=a_1*g_1 + b_1*g_2\)
- \(v_2=a_2*g_1 + b_2*g_2\)
- \(v_3=a_3*g_1 + b_3*g_2\)
- do Guassian elimination and we get
- \(a*v_1-a*v_2 = g_2\)
- \(b*v_2-b*v_3 = g_2\)
- from here we get LD
- the Gaussian elim idea is also kinda used in determinants